IVAN Development
The Cathedral of Attnam > General IVAN Discussion| Page 2 of 3 | Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next |
|
Print
|
Oct 1, 2009 at 9:58 pm |
#30
![]() |
|
![]() The Imperialist |
Joined: Dec 2, 2007 Location: New Attnam Interests: bananas Posts: 1224 Groups: | |
|
I know, I know | ||
![]() | ||
Oct 14, 2009 at 1:52 am |
#35
![]() |
|
![]() |
Joined: Feb 11, 2008 Location: Gnosticus IV Posts: 343 | |
|
Nice to see that you're still around, Planplan. | ||
Oct 15, 2009 at 12:42 pm |
#36
![]() |
|
![]() zombie |
Joined: Feb 28, 2008 Occupation: Web developper Location: Paris Posts: 38 Groups: | |
|
I'm always around, but I have a lot of work and a body that hate that ;P | ||
Oct 22, 2009 at 10:46 am |
#37
![]() |
|
![]() |
Joined: Dec 16, 2007 Occupation: Vigorous training. Location: In the forests of Finland, looking for long forgotten explosives. Interests: Mines Posts: 1571 Groups: | |
|
Capristo, if you haven't already, please add sPlath, Iankill and Planplan to the sub-forum. JimmyJ and others who want to see the sub-forum: It's not visible because I, or we, don't see any gain from making it visible. If you want to contribute then say so and I'll have you added to the "team". If not, then wait for our announcements about the progress. | ||
|
Last edited by Ernomouse : Oct 22, 2009 at 12:15 pm. I'm the master sissi who PISSES off MINES. | ||
Oct 23, 2009 at 3:36 am |
#40
![]() |
|
![]() archangel |
Joined: Jan 11, 2008 Posts: 933 | |
|
Ok, so in other words if we aren't hearing anything nothing is happening? I mean I understand you want to avoid people criticizing the project before it gets off the ground, but I'm concerned because of what I'm not seeing. If you guys are still missing key sorts of people, maybe you should go searching for people who might be interested in the jobs needed on other sites; no offense to those who've shown up but betting on people appearing out of thin air to fill needed places isn't precisely a winning strategy. As far as the progress I'd like to see, something like bi or trimonthly state of the union addressals would be fine (not expecting something like Toady's daily updates here, but when it's been more or less totally quiet for that long I get antsy and wondering if anything's coming of that announcement or if it's going to dissipate without explanation the same way the last time someone said they were reviving IVAN development did). One other thing: if you really want this to be a separate project, why not just make a new section for this? That way things like suggestions, bugs, and announcements have a home in advance (and plausibly relevant topics that already exist can be cribbed into the relevant new spots). Also what could perhaps be done is tagging the hidden board on there instead of in IVAN coding. IVAN variants could stand to get their own section as part of the restructuring, presuming that with the new version comes more active interest (and also could maybe have a buddy in the form of an IVAN variant development subforum). | ||
|
Last edited by BDR : Oct 23, 2009 at 3:44 am. | ||
Oct 23, 2009 at 4:25 pm |
#44
![]() |
|
![]() The Imperialist |
Joined: Dec 2, 2007 Location: New Attnam Interests: bananas Posts: 1224 Groups: | |
|
Maybe visible to contributing members only? i.e. those with 5+ posts? | ||
![]() | ||
Oct 24, 2009 at 3:25 am |
#46
![]() |
|
![]() archangel |
Joined: Jan 11, 2008 Posts: 933 | |
|
Makes sense to me to do it that way too. Both concerns are addressed this way and no more wondering. | ||
Oct 27, 2009 at 8:40 pm |
#48
![]() |
|
![]() zombie |
Joined: Feb 28, 2008 Occupation: Web developper Location: Paris Posts: 38 Groups: | |
|
Here what I can see. | ||
|
| ||
|
Print
|
||
| Page 2 of 3 | Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next |
The Cathedral of Attnam > General IVAN Discussion > IVAN Development


Oct 1, 2009 at 8:42 pm

The Imperialist




archangel
angel
giant spider
zombie
), allowed people could see and post, others (maybe selected) could just see ?

Also, making it visible would allow people that are curious to just statisfy that curiosity, while they won't need to be 'developer'. The danger exists that people would enlist themselves as developer just to see the progress (and possibly whine about it). Allowing the board to be seen by either everyone, or a 'spectator' group, would solve that problem.